Skip to main content
· 12/29/1989

Ackerman v. Schwartz

Citations

  • 733 F. Supp. 1231
  • 1989 WL 200232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if the expert’s competency to testify as an expert is sufficiently established, then his opinion would be potentially admissible at trial and should be considered for purposes of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.