Ackerman v. Schultz (In Re Schultz)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the value of a professional practice owned by a debt- or is attributable to many different assets including human capital, goodwill, name, recognition, consumer brand loyalty, or special relationships with suppliers or clients
• \[T]he law of the case doctrine is inapplicable to the instant action. This is not the same litigation or a different litigation between the same parties.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).