Ackerman v. Ackerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proceeds from a disability insurance policy constituted “income” under MCL 552.602(c)(ii) for the purpose of spousal support even though the policy was purchased after the entry of the divorce judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Woodington v. Shokoohi
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-05-04· cited 238×
• Gates v. Gates
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-07-01· cited 135×
• Hanaway v. Hanaway
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-01-17· cited 72×
• Moore v. Moore
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 64×
• Luckow Estate v. Luckow
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2011-01-27· cited 43×
• Hagen v. Hagen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-11-01· cited 11×
• Thaddeus J Andrusz v. Jacqueline R Andrusz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2017-07-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sparks v. Sparks
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-30· cited 264×
• Beason v. Beason
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 174×
• Lee v. Lee
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-08-29· cited 28×
• Rapaport v. Rapaport
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 16×
• Torakis v. Torakis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-05-05· cited 13×
• Vollmer v. Vollmer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-03-13· cited 12×
• Flager v. Flager
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 7×