Customs and Patent Appeals· 3/20/1911
Acker v. United States
Citations
- 1 Ct. Cust. 328
- 1911 WL 20012
- 1911 CCPA LEXIS 54
Judges: Barber, Hunt, Montgomery, Smith, Vries
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. WalterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1913-04-22· cited 25×
- Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1912-05-08· cited 14×
- Wanamaker v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1925-05-11· cited 12×
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1926-01-18· cited 8×
- Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1947-08-15· cited 8×
- United States v. Fung Chong Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1946-07-09· cited 6×
- United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1925-03-23· cited 5×
- United States v. John B. Stetson Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1933-04-12· cited 3×
- Pacific Overseas Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1953-02-05
- Premier Graining Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1966-06-27
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court· 1891-03-30· cited 179×
- American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court· 1891-11-09· cited 131×
- Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court· 1894-03-12· cited 63×
- Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court· 1895-11-11· cited 52×
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-11-11· cited 47×
- Saltonstall v. WiebuschSupreme Court· 1895-03-04· cited 27×
- Toplitz v. HeddenSupreme Court· 1892-11-28· cited 21×
- Berbecker v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1894-03-12· cited 11×
- Seeberger v. CahnSupreme Court· 1890-11-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.