Ackelmire v. North Vermillion Community School Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that strict compliance with Rule 4-215 is mandatory and that a trial judge’s failure to inform a defendant of the allowable penalties for the offenses charged in the indictment cannot constitute harmless error
• holding that strict compliance with Rule 4-215 is mandatory and that a trial judge's failure to inform a defendant of the allowable penalties for the offenses charged in the indictment cannot constitute harmless error
• reversing conviction because trial court did not inform defendant of allowable penalties
• reversing conviction because trial court did not inform defendant of allowable penalties
• failure to advise defendant about allowable penalties on the charges of which he was convicted
• insufficient that defendant knew his Rule 4-215 rights and was provided a copy of charging document; his waiver of those rights was not knowing because they were not given by the circuit court judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).