Skip to main content
· 4/17/1995

Acierno v. Worthy Brothers Pipeline Corp.

Citations

  • 656 A.2d 1085
  • 1995 WL 106770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that commentaries are useful aids in interpreting statutory meaning
  • adopting majority rule that the adoption of the U.C.C. did not displace the common law doctrine of accord and satisfaction
  • \An official comment [to the U.C.C.] written by the drafters of a statute and available to a legislature before the statute is enacted has considerable weight as an aid to statutory construction.\
  • \To sustain an accord and satisfaction the party asserting it must show that there was uncertainty regarding the amount of the debt and that the uncertainty was the result of a bona fide dispute based on mutual good faith\
  • relying on official commentary to uniform act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, C.J., Hartnett and Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.