California Supreme Court· 6/8/1979
Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.
Citations
- 595 P.2d 619
- 24 Cal. 3d 502
- 156 Cal. Rptr. 41
- 44 Cal. Comp. Cases 714
- 1979 Cal. LEXIS 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- employer liable for contractor’s operation of bulldozer without warning devices in an area where persons are working
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manuel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 696×
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 338×
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-07-19· cited 264×
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal· 1981-05-29· cited 234×
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-03-28· cited 125×
- Ermoian v. Desert HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-22· cited 118×
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-08-15· cited 103×
- Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1998-06-01· cited 94×
- Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal· 1995-02-17· cited 71×
- Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1987-10-20· cited 67×
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal· 1994-10-13· cited 63×
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-12-21· cited 56×
- Dennis Rooney, Reliance Insurance Co., Plaintiff-In-Intervention-Appellee v. United States of America, & Third-Party v. Contel Corp., Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1980-12-31· cited 55×
- Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. Vars, Pave, McCord & FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-08-12· cited 53×
- Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-17· cited 52×
- Isabel YANEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1995-10-23· cited 51×
- Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court· 1986-01-08· cited 48×
- Camozzi v. Roland/Miller & Hope Consulting GroupNinth Circuit· 1989-01-20· cited 46×
- Peone v. Regulus Stud Mills, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-10-02· cited 44×
- Torres v. Xomox Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1996-08-30· cited 41×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court· 1975-03-31· cited 760×
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-02-09· cited 547×
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-04-28· cited 385×
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 326×
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-12-04· cited 238×
- Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-02-21· cited 193×
- Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-03-15· cited 105×
- Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-12-19· cited 78×
- Griesel v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1979-03-08· cited 63×
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-03-02· cited 56×
- Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court· 1964-02-06· cited 42×
- Elder v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-01-31· cited 41×
- Ferrel v. Safway Steel ScaffoldsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-05-15· cited 40×
- Lemos v. EichelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-07-24· cited 28×
- Widman v. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1971-08-27· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.