Acevedo v. Van Dorn Plastic MacHinery Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that because employer knew of employee’s machine-related injury before its bankruptcy, its failure to notify machine’s manufacturer about the injury would make manufacturer’s post-confirmation claim non-dischargeable
• reasoning that because employer knew of employee’s machine-related injury before its bankruptcy, its failure to notify machine’s manufacturer about the injury would make manufacturer’s post-confirmation claim non-dischargeable
• “[D]ue process should ... require that a debtor notify a creditor of his claim when the creditor is unlikely to know about the claim otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).