Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A caller’s name (and certainly not a caller’s alias) has no real ‘meaning’ to a consumer.... Thus, the only way for an identity disclosure to be meaningful to a consumer is if it discloses the name of the debt collection company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).