· 9/25/1984
Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department
Citations
- 690 P.2d 38
- 142 Ariz. 319
- 44 A.L.R. 4th 631
- 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that supervision of probationers is an administrative task, unconnected with the performance of a judicial function
- holding that supervision of probationers is an administrative task, unconnected with the performance of a judicial function
- holding that probation officers who allowed defendant to have contact with minors in violation of court order could not assert sovereign immunity
- holding that probation officers who allowed defendant to have contact with minors in violation of court order could not assert sovereign immunity
- holding probation officer not immune from suit for actions taken contrary to court’s directive
- probation officers’ permitting probationer to have contact with children under the age of 15 in violation of court order, which contact resulted in plaintiff children being molested, was nondiscretionary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.