Skip to main content
· 9/25/1984

Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department

Citations

  • 690 P.2d 38
  • 142 Ariz. 319
  • 44 A.L.R. 4th 631
  • 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that supervision of probationers is an administrative task, unconnected with the performance of a judicial function
  • holding that supervision of probationers is an administrative task, unconnected with the performance of a judicial function
  • holding that probation officers who allowed defendant to have contact with minors in violation of court order could not assert sovereign immunity
  • holding that probation officers who allowed defendant to have contact with minors in violation of court order could not assert sovereign immunity
  • holding probation officer not immune from suit for actions taken contrary to court’s directive
  • probation officers’ permitting probationer to have contact with children under the age of 15 in violation of court order, which contact resulted in plaintiff children being molested, was nondiscretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.