Acevedo Rodriguez, Javier J v. D De Correccion Y Rehabilitacion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even a person who lives in the same dwelling does not have unlimited authority to consent to a search of the premises
• noting that “the officers were aware” that the defendant’s items “were in a specific area separate from” everything else
• noting that \the officers were aware\ that the defendant's items \were in a specific area separate from\ everything else
• stating that person had reasonable expectation of privacy in closed gym bag, even though bag could be unzipped
• stating that “by placing his gym bag under the bed, [the defendant] ‘manifested an expectation that the contents would remain free from public examination’ ”
• stating that “the few cases” in which the Ninth Circuit applied assumption of risk analysis “involved situations where the person whose property was searched clearly ceded authority over the property, either partially or totally, to the consenting third party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).