Aceto v. National Community Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that departures are based on “the provisions of the Guidelines themselves,” whereas variances are “deviation[s] from the Guidelines range based on application of other statutory [sentencing] factors” (quotation marks removed)
• district courts may vary upward from the Guidelines if justified by Section 3553(a) factors
• “variant sentences are generally reasonable when the reasons justifying the variance are ∗ For reasons appearing to the court, we placed this appeal in abeyance for United States v. Jackson, 127 F.4th 448, 455 (4th Cir. 2025
• “variant sentences are generally reasonable when the reasons justifying the variance are ∗ For reasons appearing to the court, we placed this appeal in abeyance for United States v. Jackson, 127 F.4th 448, 455 (4th Cir. 2025

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).