Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding difference between judgmental and clerical error is “whether the error occurred in rendering the judgment or in recording the judgment rendered.”
• explaining that courts may correct clerical errors, but may not change the 5 BACKUS v. BACKUS Decision of the Court substance of a judgment if it reflects the court’s intended result
• denying the defendants' motion for relief for failing to file a witness and exhibit list and making untimely objections to the plaintiffs' certificate of readiness
• addressing Ariz. R. Civ. P. 60(a), which, at the time, was textually identical to Rule 85(A)
• addressing Ariz. R. Civ. P. 60(a), the civil counterpart to Rule 85(A)
• “It is not incumbent upon the court to develop an argument for a party [that offered no counter- interpretation of the interest provision].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).