Accettullo v. Worcester Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The statute is admittedly punitive in nature. ... It is the punitive aspect of the statute that effectuates the underlying purpose of the statute and provides the impetus to settle cases.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• “[A]n award of interest under § 52–192a is mandatory, and the application of § 52–192a does not depend on an analysis of the underlying circumstances of the case or a determination of the facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-29· cited 48×
• Cardenas v. Mixcus
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-17· cited 23×
• Town of Branford v. Barbara
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-16· cited 20×
• Stiffler v. Continental Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-22· cited 17×
• Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-25· cited 9×
• Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-06-03· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-02· cited 356×
• Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-01-21· cited 125×
• Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-08-21· cited 59×
• Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-07-06· cited 41×
• Lutynski v. B.B. & J. Trucking, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-31· cited 30×
• Edward Denike Tree Co. v. Butler
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-05-01· cited 25×