Accessories Biz, Inc. v. Linda and Jay Keane, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insurance policy exclusion barred coverage where “the underlying action ... alleges only intentional acts on the part of the plaintiff’
• “L & J argues that the Samples themselves are a form of advertising, but New York courts have routinely held that the phrase “advertising idea” does not include the product itself.”
• “L & J argues that the Samples themselves are a form of advertising, but New York courts have routinely held that the phrase “advertising idea” does not include the product itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).