Access 4 All, Inc. v. Trump International Hotel & Tower Condominium

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court must be “satisfied that the parties are not taken by surprise or deprived of a reasonable opportunity to contest facts averred outside the pleadings”
• finding that a fifteen-month pre-removal detention was not unreasonably prolonged to require another bond hearing
• “In the context of the ADA, awareness of discriminatory conditions, and the avoidance of a public accommodation because of that awareness, is injury in fact.” (citations omitted)
• “District courts, however, can review claims by aliens challenging the constitutionality of their pre-removal detention.”
• “No statute requires an alien to exhaust administrative remedies before challenging detention. And courts can excuse a failure to exhaust if the case presents a substantial constitutional question.”
• “Normally, summary judgment is inappropriate before the parties have had an opportunity for discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).