Acceptance Insurance Company v. Canter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Minnesota law to interpret the language \in the business of\ in a similar insurance policy
• implicitly rejecting the fact that the driver was pulling the lessee’s empty trailer as a factor in determining that bobtail insurance applied
• the exclusion does not apply and there is bobtail coverage
• driver was not acting in the business of a motor carrier when he was driving home with no load to deliver, had no instructions to proceed to a particular destination, and was \off-duty and free to spend the weekend as he wished\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).