Accardi v. SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA CTY.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute of limitations tolled by \continuing violation\ doctrine \if any of the discriminatory practices continues into the limitations period\
• holding that claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against employer based on alleged harassment was not barred by the exclusivity rule because sexual harassment was “outside the normal employment environment”
• explaining that, under the continuing violation doctrine, “a complaint arising under FEHA is timely if any of the discriminatory practices continues into the limitations period”
• “claim for emotional distress arising out of sexual harassment is not barred by the exclusivity provisions of workers’ compensation laws.”
• \A claim for damages under FEHA is not preempted by the Workers' Compensation Act.\
• plaintiff allowed to challenge explicit gender discrimination beginning 11 years before filing suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).