ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in equitable mootness analysis that the appellants’ suggested “relief would rewrite the terms of the bargain, which is beyond the power of the Court”
• stating that appellants had “fallen into the trap of confusing equitable and constitutional mootness”
• finding the second Chateaugay II factor inappo-site where it was undisputed that the Debtors had been liquidated and effectively ceased to exist
• dismissing appeal as equitably moot in a Chapter 11 proceeding where the “Debtors have been liquidated and effectively cease to exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).