A.C. Ex Rel. Johanny C. v. Sylvestre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that applicant was so entitled because, logically, “we cannot have meaningful judicial review without giving the applicant notice and op- portunity to corroborate”
• noting that the BIA ignored supplemental evidence on appeal “as required by law”
• An IJ must provide the petitioner with “notice [of the facts requiring corroboration and] an opportunity to provide corroborating evidence or explain its unavailability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).