Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/27/2020
Abruquah v. State
Citations
- 240 A.3d 1205
- 471 Md. 249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding “for the Circuit Court to consider whether, in light of [the Court of Appeals’] decision in Rochkind v. Stevenson, . . . the Circuit Court would reach a different conclusion concerning the admission of firearm and toolmark identification testimony . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-14· cited 14×
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-12-20· cited 3×
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-12-28
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-07
- Abruquah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-20
- State v. Thornton & DunbarCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2026-06-26
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Sissoko v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-09· cited 680×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 224×
- State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-25· cited 56×
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-24· cited 33×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-04· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.