Abraxas Foundation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Claimant’s testimony that he is unable to perform his TV technician job is consistent with Dr. Bednarz’s testimony.”
• “Moreover, a claimant is not required to produce unequivocal medical evidence to establish continuing disability, but rather, the testimony of the claimant alone can be sufficient to satisfy his burden of establishing that his disability continues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).