Abramyan v. United States Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]nsofar as they contain commentary on [a speaker’s] credibility and recommendations . . . the handwritten notes are . . . ‘quintessentially deliberative’”
• holding that the Assessment to Refer in that case was both predecisional and deliberative
• noting that a “verbatim transcript” of an interview would not be deliberative
• noting that a “verbatim transcript” of an interview would not be deliberative
• “Assessments of credibility and recommendations are ‘quintessential deliberative information.’ ” (quoting Anguimate v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 918 F.Supp.2d 13, 19 (D.D.C. 2013))
• \A record is deliberative if 'it reflects the give-and-take of the consultative process.'\ (emphasis added) (quoting Judicial Watch, Inc. v. FDA , 449 F.3d 141 , 151 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).