Abramson v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• orthopedist with requisite knowledge and experience could properly testify concerning negligence of neurologist’s standard of care
• “under Daubert[ v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U. S. 579 (113 SC 2786, 125 LE2d 469) (1993)], disputes as to an expert’s credentials are properly explored through cross-examination at trial and go to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility”
• under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U. S. 579 (113 SC 2786, 125 LE2d 469) (1993), disputes as to an expert’s credentials were properly explored through cross-examination at trial and go to the weight and credibility of the testimony, not its admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).