Abramson v. Western Maryland Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding typicality existed for a class of “[a]ll persons who are or were detainees” at certain correctional centers during a defined period
• “Using different terminology, such as 3 change-out, does not change the observation of a naked admittee to anything other than what it 4 is—a strip search.”
• “Defendants contend that the Second Circuit has determined that in order to be constitutionally problematic, a strip search must target the breast, genitals, and anus.... This misstates the law of this Circuit.”
• “This procedure squarely fits both the common and legal definitions of strip search ... Using different terminology, such as change-out, does not change the observation of a naked admittee to anything other than what it is — a strip search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).