Abrams v. Schulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “interpretations of the Federal Rules provide persuasive guidance” where a Delaware court rule “closely track[ed]” an analogous federal rule
• deciding interpretations of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide “persuasive guidance” for interpretation of Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure
• deciding interpretations of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide “persuasive guidance” for interpretation of Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure
• observing that an interpretation of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that closely tracks a Delaware rule “provide[s] persuasive guidance” in interpreting the Delaware rule
• noting that when our state court Mediacom Delaware LLC v. Sea Colony Recreational Association, Inc. C.A. No. 2018-0003-JRS March 13, 2018 Page 4 rule tracks the corresponding federal rule our courts deem federal decisions interpreting the rule to be “persuasive” authority
• referring to the ODC as an agency of this court, which is consistent with the principle that the Supreme Court alone has the inherent and exclusive responsibility for disciplinary matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).