Skip to main content

Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express

Citations

  • 819 S.W.2d 338
  • 1991 Mo. LEXIS 120
  • 1991 WL 244321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The primary role of courts in construing statutes is to ascertain the intent of the legislature from the language used in the statute and, if possible, give effect to that intent.”
  • “Substantial caselaw holds that no statutory authority exists for judicial review of temporary or partial awards made pursuant to § 287.510 and its statutory predecessors.”
  • broadly construing a remedial statute regarding filing deadlines for worker’s compensation claims
  • broadly construing a remedial statute regarding filing deadlines for worker's compensation claims
  • statutes are to be interpreted to avoid unreasonable results
  • statutes are to be interpreted to avoid unreasonable results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holstein, Robertson, Rendlen, Covington, Blackmar, Benton, Higgins, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.