Abrams v. Abrams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Georgia cases establish that execution of legal process should be done by persons “wholly disinterested” in litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Church v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-04-18· cited 23×
• Cook v. Bright
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-07-12· cited 11×
• Dotson v. Luxtron, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-09-02· cited 9×
• Yeary v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-15· cited 8×
• In the Interest of W. R. S.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-06-23· cited 3×
• Setac Corp. v. W. P. Stephens Lumber Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-07-14· cited 3×
• Don Pepe, Inc. v. Jmapco, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-01-23· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DeJarnette Supply Co. v. F. P. Plaza, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-10-10· cited 42×
• Johnson v. Shurley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1877-01-15· cited 13×
• Hillyer v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1903-10-30· cited 12×
• Flury v. Grimes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1874-07-15· cited 9×
• Hardwick v. Fry
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-02-24· cited 8×
• State v. Jeter
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1878-01-15· cited 8×