Abraham Williams v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not prejudiced by the exclusion of extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness since, inter alia, the \basic fact of an inconsistency . . . became known to the jury\
• holding that the defendant was not preju- diced by the exclusion of extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement by a witness since, inter alia, the \basic fact of an inconsis- tency . . . became known to the jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).