Abraham Loudermill and Joyce Loudermill v. The Dow Chemical Company v. M-P Construction Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony challenged by defendant as being \insufficiently supported by facts\
• witness who was not a medical doctor but who had other substantial scientific training held competent to testify as to the cause of plaintiff’s cirrhosis of the liver
• expert opinion lacking objective factual support cannot help jury and thus is inadmissible under Rule 702

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).