Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that CMS policy requiring providers to offset refunds is consistent with the statutory directive limiting reimbursement to “costs that are ‘actually incurred’”
• suggesting a distinction between arbitrary-and-capricious review under State Farm and Chevron step two
• quot- ing Rehab. Ass’n of Va. v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444, 1450 (4th Cir. 1994)
• quot- ing Rehab. Ass’n of Va. v. Kozlowski, 42 F.3d 1444, 1450 (4th Cir. 1994)
• “When the construction of an administrative regulation is at issue, it is well-established that the Secretary’s interpretation of her own regulations is entitled to substantial deference.” (citing Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512 (1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).