Abney v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indictment for burglary held not defective because it failed to recite “with intent to commit a crime”
• indictment for burglary held not defective because it failed to recite \with intent to commit a crime\
• ”[T]here was ample time [for the defendant] to invoke the provisions of the Uniform Act to secure the attendance of witnesses who were absent from this jurisdiction.”
• \[T]here was ample time [for the defendant] to invoke the provisions of the Uniform Act to secure the attendance of witnesses who were absent from this jurisdiction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lovett v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 49×
• Varble v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-01-22· cited 32×
• Thompson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1983-06-15· cited 16×
• Godsey v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1983-12-09· cited 6×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wylie v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 31×
• Harrison v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1977-08-12· cited 2×