ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc. v. McGahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an interstate antisuit injunction is appropriate where “‘a clear equity demands’” (quoting Christensen v. Integrity Ins. Co., 719 S.W.2d 161, 163 (Tex. 1986))
• holding an interstate antisuit injunction is appropriate where “‘a clear equity demands’” (quoting Christensen v. Integrity Ins. Co., 719 S.W.2d 161, 163 (Tex. 1986))
• foreclosure proceedings are quasi in rem actions; thus, for the trial court to obtain subject matter jurisdiction, a mortgagee must name a personal representative for a deceased mortgagor in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding
• foreclosure proceedings are quasi in rem actions; thus, for the trial court to obtain subject matter jurisdiction, a mortgagee must name a personal representative for a deceased mortgagor in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding
• “The foreclosure action is based on the note, the vehicle which gives the plaintiff the legal right to proceed against the property. The object of the foreclosure action is to enforce the obligation created by that contract ***.”
• “Consistent with the foregoing authorities, we 11 conclude that a mortgage foreclosure proceeding must be deemed a quasi in rem action. One of the 12 pivotal differences between in rem and quasi in rem actions is whether the defendant is the property 13 or a named person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).