Skip to main content
· 10/9/1961

Ablah v. Eyman

Citations

  • 365 P.2d 181
  • 188 Kan. 665
  • 90 A.L.R. 2d 766
  • 1961 Kan. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • actions in replevin, although restitutionary in character, are classified as tort actions
  • actions in replevin, although restitutionary in character, are classified as tort actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fatzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.