Abl Mgmt. v. Board of Sup'rs of S. Univ.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is a cardinal rule of statutory interpretation that ‘it will not be presumed that the Legislature inserted idle, meaningless or superfluous language in the statute or that it intended for any part or provision of the statute to be meaningless, redundant or useless.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).