Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the inconvenience and expense of the administrative and judicial review process cannot constitute manifest inadequacy
• holding that the inconvenience and expense of the administrative and judicial review process cannot constitute manifest inadequacy
• noting that Section 704 of the APA “is mirrored in the court’s residual jurisdiction case law, which ... prescribes that section 1581(i) supplies jurisdiction only if a remedy under another section of 1581 is unavailable or manifestly inadequate”
• noting that Section 704 of the APA “is mirrored in the court’s residual jurisdiction case law, which ... prescribes that section 1581® supplies jurisdiction only if a remedy under another section of 1581 is unavailable or manifestly inadequate”
• noting that Section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act (which provides that “[a]gency action made reviewable by statute and final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court are subject to judicial review”, 5 U.S.C. § 704 (2000)
• “The absence of certainty regarding the dumping margins and final assessment of antidumping duties is a characteristic of the retrospective system of administrative reviews designed by Congress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).