Abington Crest Nursing Rehabilitation Center v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the bottom line [was that] the Secretary’s interpretation of the Secretary’s own regulation [was] neither ‘plainly erroneous’ nor ‘inconsistent with the regulation,’ and it therefore command[ed] [the court’s] deference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).