Second Circuit· 8/5/2004

Abimbola v. Ashcroft

Citations

378 F.3d 173
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that third degree larceny under section 53a–124 is categorically an aggravated felony theft offense
holding that when a term in INA is undefined, the “BIA’s interpretation is ‘given controlling weight unless [it is] arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute’” (alteration in original
suggesting that the jurisdictional effect of lack of exhaustion where the government fails to object was an open issue
suggesting that the jurisdictional effect of lack of exhaustion where the government fails to object was an open issue
noting that “[t]he inclusion of nolo contendere pleas in the statute ... reflects that Congress focused the sanction of removal on a criminal conviction as opposed to an admission of guilt”
holding third-degree larceny under Connecticut law to be aggravated felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.