Skip to main content
· 1/3/1922

Abersold v. Marcus

Citations

  • 272 Pa. 199
  • 116 A. 111
  • 1922 Pa. LEXIS 800

Syllabus

<p>Libel — Ambiguous expressions — Case for jury.</p> <p>1. Where words of an alleged libel are ambiguous, and reasonably capable of two meanings, one of which is actionable, and the other innocent, it is for the jury to say in which sense the words were uttered or understood.</p> <p>2. The following language is ambiguous and the case accordingly for the jury: “He [plaintiff], while acting as our [defendants’] agent, collected money for our house and solicited business for us, which he turned over to one of our competitors.”</p>

Judges: Frazer, Moschzisker, Sadler, Schaffer, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.