Skip to main content
· 1/7/1960

Aberdeen Hills Second Corp. v. Biafore

Citations

  • 24 F.R.D. 502
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 86
  • 1960 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A motion to strike under Rule 12(f) is not a mechanism for deciding disputed issues of law or fact....”
  • “A motion to strike under Rule 12(f) is not a mechanism for deciding disputed issues of law or fact, especially where, as here, there has been no discovery, and the factual issues on which the motion to strike largely depends are disputed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.