Aberdeen-Franklin Coal Co. v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may not object to the admission of evidence on one ground and seek reversal on appeal based on a different ground
• holding that defendant failed to preserve his argument that victim's statements were inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause where his grounds for objection at trial was that the statements were hearsay
• concluding that statements made by declarant who was crying and disoriented were excited utterances
• holding that defendant’s hearsay objection was insufficient to preserve Confrontation Clause issue on appeal
• holding that a defendant’s hearsay objection was insufficient to preserve a confrontation claim
• holding that domestic violence victim’s statement to officer that defendant had pushed her down and hit her was admissible under the excited utterance exception where the declarant was disoriented, crying, without shoes, and almost ran into the officer in her attempt to find help

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).