Abercrombie v. Cullen

Citations

• 108 Wash. 515
• 185 P. 595
• 1919 Wash. LEXIS 914

Syllabus

<p>Corporations (57)—Stock—Transfers'—Contracts—Actions. It is no defense to an action for a refund due the buyer of mining stock that, after its purchase, he received more than the purchase price from a third person upon a forfeited option given on the stock, since that was his own affair.</p> <p>Mines and Minerals (17, 19-1)—Contracts—Sale and Development. Upon an issue as to the terms of a contract for the development and sale of mining claims, which defendants claim left plaintiff indebted to them, held that conflicting evidence preponderates in favor of the plaintiff, in view of the fact of defendants’ borrowing money from and making a payment to plaintiff at the time of plaintiff’s alleged indebtedness to them.</p>