Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting court of appeals can affirm on different grounds supported by the record
• “no designer should have a monopoly on designs regarded by the public as the basic form of a particular item”
• “no designer should have a monopoly on designs regarded by the public as the basic form of a particular item”
• “no designer should have a monopoly on designs regarded by the public as the basic form of a particular item”
• “no designer should have a monopoly on designs regarded by the public as the basic form of a particular item”
• “[N]o designer should have a monopoly on designs regarded by the public as the basic form of a particular item”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).