Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Moose Creek, Inc. Juno of California, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the evidence “failjed] to rebut the determination of clear inconsistency” and therefore the application of the doctrine of judicial estoppel was not an abuse of discretion
• noting that the differences in the marks there were a “trivial distinction with no effect on our observation that with a single glance at the two images, one is immediately struck by their similarity”
• explaining that a court must look at the mark in its entirety
• analyzing a mark as it appears in the market place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).