Abend v. Klaudt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the provisions of OCGA § 9-3-72, relating to foreign object cases, when construed in light of the judicially created continuing tort doctrine upon which it was based, and in pari materia with OCGA § 9-3-73 (d), (e), plainly preclude application of the statute of repose
• holding that the provisions of OCGA § 9-3-72, relating to foreign object cases, when construed in light of the judicially created continuing tort doctrine upon which it was based, and in pari materia with OCGA § 9-3-73 (d, e), plainly preclude application of the statute of repose
• one-year statute of limitation begins to run only when plaintiff knew or by the exercise of ordinary care should have learned that foreign object was causing injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).