Abena v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that contractual limitations period was “broad enough” to encompass the plaintiff’s claim under ERISA
• applying three-year limit measured from original claim to later decision to terminate benefits where limit still allowed seven months to file suit after termination decision
• by his own admission, there was \no reason\ plaintiff could not have filed suit during the remaining seven months of limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).