Abell v. Duparcy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that that the alleged adverse employment action \must objectively alter for the worse the terms and conditions of a plaintiff's employment\
• concluding that the investigation and monitoring of Plaintiff were not adverse because they did not “result[] in any change, material or otherwise, in the terms or conditions of [Plaintiff’s] employment
• noting that courts in this Circuit have held that “investigations alone” are not adverse employment actions (citations omitted)
• finding that plaintiff’s “wholly conclusory” allegations were “insufficient to raise [plaintiff’s] pleading above the speculative level.”
• monitoring of plaintiffs “attendance, even if [stricter than] the scrutiny given to his colleagues” does not constitute materially adverse action
• explaining that “close monitoring by a supervisor or excessive scrutiny” do not “constitute adverse employment actions in the absence of other negative results such as a decrease in pay or being placed on probation” (citations and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).