Abell v. Albert F. Goetze, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The lower court, sitting without a jury, found as a fact that appellant ‘did not receive an injury . . . in the course of his employment . . . .’” (emphasis added)
• “We certainly cannot say [the judge’s] finding, that the appellant did not receive an injury . . . in the course of his employment, was clearly in error . . . .” (emphasis added)
• “The burden is upon the appellant to overcome the presumption that the decision of the Commission is prima facie correct, and he must do this to the satisfaction of the trier of the facts”; emphasis suggested by Kelly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).