Abdeljabbar v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that the . . . language [in the Consolidated Appropriations Act] continues to satisfy the requirements of FOIA’s Exemption [3], and may be invoked by the ATF to withhold the trace information”
• “finding adequate the ATF’s search of TECS and N-Force in order to respond to the plaintiffs FOIA request”
• “Congress’s decision to incorporate similar language into appropriations bills after 2009 demonstrates its intent to continue the disclosure prohibition.”
• “Congress’s decision to incorporate similar language into appropriations bills after 2009 demonstrates its intent to continue the disclosure prohibition.”
• “Congress’s decision to incorporate similar language into 3 appropriations bills after 2009 demonstrates its intent to continue the disclosure prohibition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).