Abdelhamid v. Altria Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there were “no facts alleged in the [complaint]” from which the court could reasonably infer liability
• holding that “[w]hen divining the point at which an argument turns from merely losing to losing and sanctionable[,] courts must resolve all doubts in favor of the signer of the pleading” (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)
• declining to impose monetary sanctions because, inter alia, there was “no evidence of bad faith or intent to harass or injure”
• “When divining the point at which an argument turns from merely losing to losing and sanctionable[,] courts must resolve all doubts in favor of the signer of the pleading.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).